Whitespots
vs GitLab Ultimate
Vendor-agnostic DevSecOps vs. security features bundled inside a single platform.
Summary at a glance
Whitespots wins on
- → Works with GitHub, Bitbucket, Azure DevOps and GitLab
- → Custom checks configured in UI — no pipeline YAML
- → Built-in vulnerability-management workflow (triage, SLAs)
- → Pipelineless integration
- → Better support (dedicated messenger vs email + portal)
GitLab Ultimate wins on
- → Deep integration with GitLab-native workflows
- → Single-vendor procurement simplicity
- → Already bundled if your org already pays for Ultimate
- → End-to-end DevOps platform — SCM, CI/CD, registry, planning and security in one tool
- → Native Merge Request security reports and policies inside the GitLab UI
TCO at 200 devs (yr)
Side by side
Whitespots
"Full-lifecycle AppSec — scan, manage, resolve."
GitLab Ultimate
"Security features bundled into the GitLab DevOps platform."
Detailed comparison
Use Cases
Ease of Use
Flexibility & Customisation
Privacy & Security
Pricing
When to choose each
Choose Whitespots if…
- You use GitHub, Bitbucket, Azure DevOps — or a mix — and don't want to be locked to one VCS.
- Your team wants pipelineless webhook onboarding instead of authoring GitLab CI jobs.
- You need a real triage workflow with SLAs and ownership, not just a Vulnerability Report list.
- You need custom dedup, validation or CVSS rules configurable in a UI.
- Your org would struggle to justify Ultimate tier for every user just to unlock security features.
Choose GitLab Ultimate if…
- You want single-vendor procurement and GitLab already covers your DevOps platform.
- Your entire engineering org lives inside GitLab and is unlikely to change.
- You're already paying for Ultimate and the security features are effectively bundled.
- You want one end-to-end DevOps platform covering SCM, CI/CD, registry, planning and security.
- Security findings must live natively inside Merge Request UI and policies, not a separate tool.
Migration from GitLab Ultimate
Typical timeline
No data migration step. Point Whitespots at the same GitLab, trackers, registries and cloud accounts; the platform discovers projects and rescans from source within a sprint — no CI jobs to port.
No state import needed
Whitespots connects directly to GitLab via webhook and scans from source, so findings are regenerated from scratch — with your dedup, validation and CVSS rules applied from day one. No dismissal state to untangle.
Free PoC program
Run Whitespots alongside GitLab Ultimate for 30 days. No lock-in. Your Whitespots engineer handles the setup.
True cost of ownership
Adjust inputs to see year-1 and year-2 totals including hidden costs.
Whitespots
GitLab Ultimate
* GitLab Ultimate per-user pricing is negotiated per contract; $500/developer/year is used here as a conservatively discounted public estimate. List pricing is typically higher. Whitespots figures are EUR converted to USD for like-for-like comparison.
Common questions
How is Whitespots different from GitLab Ultimate?
We already pay for GitLab Ultimate. Why would we add Whitespots?
Does Whitespots work with other VCS providers?
Can I run Whitespots alongside GitLab Ultimate during a trial?
How does the pricing actually compare?
What support tier do I get at the listed price?
See Whitespots in action
Scan your first repository in 15 seconds, or talk to an engineer about your specific setup.